Legal Opinion

Evert v. Felska

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1928No. 26,613Published

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

The appeal is from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff seeks to recover a stockholder’s assessment arising out of defendant’s alleged constitutional liability. Defendant claims an equitable set-off equal to his stockholder’s liability by reason of a loan made to the corporation prior to its failure. He received a promissory note containing a statement that the corporation would not pay any dividends until the note was paid nor would it carry merchandise in excess of $55,000. By the terms of the note it was payable out of the surplus of the maker. Defendant has filed his claim,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harper v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Richardson v. MerrittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. McCabe Brothers Co. v. Farmers Grain Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Reimers v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Helm v. Smith-Fee Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API