Condon v. H. C. Hazen Contracting Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The controlling question in this case is whether the written contract, plus the agreements for additions to and subtractions from the plans and specifications, is entire or separable; and the contrary judgments rendered by the trial court and the Court of Appeals are due to those courts having reached different conclusions upon the subject of the divisibility of the contract.
Manifestly, if the contract is entire there could not be substantial performance, under the following finding of fact of the special master: ‘ ‘ The concrete for the walls and roof had been poured, but no roofing had been…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Rich v. ArancioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Fryman v. McGheeOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Sherry v. Union Gas Utilities, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Willard Gates v. Arthur Ney, Jr. Warner Amex Cable Communications, Inc. Warner Amex Cable Communications of Cincinnati, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986