Legal Opinion

Cabeza v. Hoffman Sootin & Erro DDS PA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 26, 2004No. 3D03-2726PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Because the record evidence supports the finding that the appellant/claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to her employer, we affirm. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001); Sollecito v. Hollywood Lincoln Mercury, Inc., 450 So.2d 928 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Perez v. Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 377 So.2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Uniweld Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Relations Comm’n, 277 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Uniweld Products, Inc. v. INDUSTRIAL REL. COM'N, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Perez v. STATE, DEPT. OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Sollecito v. Hollywood Lincoln Mercury, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yanes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004