Legal Opinion

Orgeron v. McDonald

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1993No. 92 CA 0347PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge.

A defendant employer appeals from a trial court judgment that held it vicariously liable for damages caused by its employee in a two-vehicle collision. Our review of the record reveals that the trial court erred in concluding this case was an exception to the general rule that an employer is not vicariously liable for the torts of its employee while the employee is traveling to work. The trial court's finding that the employer’s accounting procedure was the equivalent of payment for travel time was manifestly erroneous. Accordingly, we reverse.

FACTS

During the early morning…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Blanchard v. OgimaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  3. Rollins v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Jackson v. LongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Romero v. HogueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API