Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cox v. Ashe, Warden

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1941No. 168 Misc. DocketPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is a habeas corpus proceeding. A rule to show cause why writ of habeas corpus should not issue was granted upon presentation of petition. Answers were thereupon filed.

On November 13, 1930, the relator, after having pleaded guilty, was sentenced by the Court of Quarter Sessions of Bedford County upon five separate bills of indictment (Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, November Sessions, 1930), each charging him with separate .acts of felonious entry and larceny. Each sentence was for a minimum term of one year and a maximum term of two years. Sentence on bill No. 3 presumably…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Halderman's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Com. Ex Rel. Swisher v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Com. Ex Rel. Miller v. AsheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lerner v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nagle v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. McDevitt v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Little v. KeenanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pitts v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API