Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

District Court, D. Utah

Decided October 6, 2014No. Case No. 2:12-cr-00502-TCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TENA CAMPBELL, District Judge.

On December 13, 2013, Defendant David Young pleaded guilty to money laundering and conspiring to violate the Procurement Integrity Act. As part of his plea, Mr. Young agreed to forfeit his interest in assets related to his conviction, • including properties connected to two entities, Wel-venture and HCH. (Statement by Def. in Advance of Plea of Guilty ¶ 12(A)(3)(a), Dkt. No. 527.) The court ordered the forfeiture of these and other assets related to Mr. Young’s convictions in its March 4, 2014 Order of Forfeiture (Dkt. No. 553).

On April 11, 2014, Petitioners…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. 1. All Funds in Account of Property Futures, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  2. White v. Whittle (In Re Whittle)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  3. United States v. BrintonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. All Assets Held in Account No. XXXXXXXX, in the Name of Doraville Props. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. USA v. LightRay CaptlCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. All Assets Held in Account Number 80020796, in the Name of Doraville Properties Corporation, at Deutsche Bank International, Limited in Jersey, Channel Islands, and All Interest, Benefits or Assets TrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API