Legal Opinion

Kronfeld v. Kronfeld

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 2002No. Nos. 3D00-3620, 3D00-3362PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the Order on Remand and the Second Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. The trial court properly gave “the husband credit for the money spent in paying off the corporate debt,” in keeping with this court’s mandate in Kronfeld v. Kronfeld, 761 So.2d 411, 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Contrary to the wife’s argument here, the trial court’s distribution properly awards each spouse 50% of the marital assets and then deducts the husband’s credit from the wife’s share.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kronfeld v. KronfeldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farrer v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002