Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Saunders
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1DissentMontgomery, Judge
When a jury awards $35,000 for 14.2 acres of rough, unimproved knob land, I blush quickly. If there ever was a case where the first blush rule applies this is it. Commonwealth, Dept. of Highways v. Holbrook, Ky., 390 S.W.2d 897.
The claim that it is desirable property to be subdivided for residence purposes is not justified. No subdivision plan has been suggested. Part of the property is located next to a railroad switching yard, which does not enhance the desirability for residence purposes.
The majority opinion on its face shows that the verdict is excessive. Before the taking, the entire…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth, Dept. of Highways v. GearhartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965