Legal Opinion

Springer v. Lawrence

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

. Heard on bill, answer and proofs in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The complainants, by their bill, ask the court to restrain the defendant from obstructing certain ditches on her own land, on the ground that they (the complainants) have a right of drainage through them for their adjoining land. The defendant, by her answer, admits such right as to a portion of complainants’ land, but denies it as to another portion, and alleges that the complainants have overcharged their easement by adding the drainage of such other portion, and for that reason she (the defendant) proposes to stop the ditches in question.

The lands in question are situate in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forbes v. ForbesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  2. Healey v. Walbrook Park Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API