Legal Opinion
F-M Asphalt, Inc. v. North Dakota State Highway Department
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1988No. Civ. 880082PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Justice.
F-M Asphalt, Inc. (F-M), appealed from a district court summary judgment dismissing its action for damages and a declaratory judgment that its bid met the requirements of the Bidders Proposal for a construction project and that the contract should have been awarded to F-M. We affirm.
F-M was the low bidder on a construction project which was subject to Special Provision 650 (S.P. 650), a four-page provision in the Bidders Proposal, dealing with the utilization of minority and women-owned business enterprises (M/WBE’s) as subcontractors. S.P. 650 set percentage goals for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Sorlie v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Production Credit Ass'n of Fargo v. FossNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- F-M Asphalt, Inc. v. North Dakota State Highway DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Metropolitan Air Research Testing Authority, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- B.W.S. Investments v. Mid-Am Restaurants, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Gateway Investors, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1990
- B.W.S. Investments v. Mid-Am Restaurants, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990