Legal Opinion
James Donald Callender v. Sioux City Residential Treatment Facility, Steve Sholl, and Kenna Norby
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1996No. 95-2919PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NANGLE, Senior District Judge.
The appellants-defendants appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee James Callender on his procedural due process claim, as well as the award of attorneys’ fees to appellee. The appellants challenge the district court’s findings that the individual defendants are hable to Mr. Callender, that Mr. Callender had a protected liberty interest in remaining in the work release program, that Mr. Callender was not given the procedural due process to which he was entitled, that the case was not moot, that the defendants were not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- James Dominique v. William WeldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Ernest Eugene Harper v. Leroy L. Young Attorney General of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Richard John Freitas, Sr., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. John Ault, Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Irene G. Howard, Defendant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Kennedy v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Persechini v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Darryl Powell v. Ralph WeissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Kitchen v. UpshawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.