Legal Opinion

State v. Meggison

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 1990No. 89-1322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

The respondent, as the defendant in a criminal case, acting through his attorney, made a written demand for discovery, the result of which was to require the State, under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(a), to disclose much information the State would otherwise not be required to .disclose throughout the first jury trial and, after a mistrial was declared, throughout the second jury trial. The convictions resulting at the second jury trial have been reversed and the case remanded for a third trial. At this point, respondent has obtained new counsel who argues that he is…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. Post-Newsweek Stations Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. State v. BoggessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Ramos v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API