Legal Opinion
Oregon State Public Interest Research Group v. Pacific Coast Seafoods Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 14, 2005No. CIV.02-924-HAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.
On March 15, 2005, this court found defendants Pacific Coast Seafoods Company, Inc. (Coast), Pacific Surimi Joint Venture, LLC, and Pacific Surimi Co., Inc. (collectively referred to as Pacific Surimi) liable for several ongoing violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act) at their Warrenton, Oregon seafood processing facility (the facility). On May 20, 2005, plaintiffs filed the pending Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 102). Plaintiffs assert that on August 5, 2004, they conducted an on-site inspection of the facility and took samples…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The Canal Authority of the State of Florida v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, the Cross-Florida Canal Association v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, Eleanor H. Miller v. Avery S. Fullerton, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States Army, J. G. Perko v. The Canal Authority of the State of Florida, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Barahona-Gomez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Idaho Conservation League v. Atlanta Gold Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 2012