Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. Glasscock

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 5, 1939No. 140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLET, District Judge.

The facts are simple and not seriously disputed. Glasscock entered into a contract with the United States to perform certain government work on the Missouri River in this district. The defendant Continental Casualty Company executed a bond for the faithful performance of the contract and the payment of bills for materials. See 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a, 270b, 270c and 270d. Plaintiff furnished certain materials to the contractor which went into the project covered by the bond. Those materials were not paid for. This action is upon that bond to recover the value of those…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCormick v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. United Construction Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Universal Construction Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Hendry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Peerless Casualty Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Bangor Roofing and Sheet Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  3. United States ex rel. Korosh v. Otis Williams & Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1939
  4. Travis Equipment Co. v. D & L Construction Co. & AssociatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963
  5. United States ex rel. B. Katchen Iron Works, Inc. v. Standard Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API