Legal Opinion
1151 Maple-37.125-EHS, LLC v. Aurea Adela Castro
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 20, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00348Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 1151 MAPLE-37.125-EHS, LLC, CASE NUMBER: 5 6 CV 26-348-DMG (SSCx) Plaintiff(s), 7 v. 8 AUREA ADELA CASTRO, ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 9 STATE COURT 10 Defendant(s). 11 12 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 13 County of L o s A n g e l e s for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 14 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 15 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.’”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.