Legal Opinion
Opinion No. (1985)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided July 23, 1985Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Lt. Rushing,
The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect:
1. May an employee of the Oklahoma Highway Patrol who is retired and receiving a benefit from the Oklahoma Law Enforcement Retirement System (OLERS) become employed by the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission, and continue to receive his retirement?
2. If the answer to Question No. 1 is yes, must the retired member continue to pay his contributions to OLERS during his reemployment?
The questions you pose center around the problems arising by the re-employment of a retired…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. TellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Maybury v. CoyneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
- Trifari v. Employees' Ret. System of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Harrill v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Mulvey v. WaldoNew York Supreme Court · 1912