Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Hudson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1915No. Sac. No. 2178Published

■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff and appellant sued to annul a contract by which defendant, w>k- is an attorney at law, agreed to represent her and her children in an endeavor to establish their title to an interest in certain property which had been theretofore patented to Fred Bader, R. L. McCutcheon, and the heirs of W. G. Wallace. Plaintiff is the widow of said W. G. Wallace, deceased. The appeal is from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.. By the terms of the agreement the defendant was to have one-half of all land recovered. In her complaint Mrs. Wallace alleged that after she entered into…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Manuel v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Noyes v. MantleSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Billings v. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API