Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Easy Living, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 14, 1981No. C-1-80-264PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HOGAN, Senior District Judge.
This is a Truth-in-Lending Act (hereinafter TILA) ease filed by the plaintiffs pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1640. There are several legal issues to be resolved concerning whether Easy Living, Inc. (hereinafter Easy Living or defendant) violated the disclosure requirements of TILA and 12 C.F.R. § 226 (hereinafter Regulation Z). The case is before us on cross-motions for summary judgment. 1
I
On May 18, 1979, plaintiffs Charles and Lena Pearson entered a contract with Easy Living. This contract served the dual purpose of refinancing a loan for furniture…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re: CPDC IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Kedziora v. Citicorp National Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Hughes v. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Margie Cox v. First National Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. MincksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.