Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided April 18, 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

At Law. Indictment of George W. Martin for mailing obscene letters in violation of Rev. St. § 3893. Heard on motion to quash and demurrer'.

1Opinion of the Court

Paul, District Judge.

In this case the defendant moves to quash the indictment on the ground that it was found by a grand jury of this court at Lynchburg in March, 1892, after a grand jury of this court at a court held at Danville in November, 1891, had reported the indictment “not a true bill.” I do not think this motion can be sustained either by the practice in Virginia or by the doctrine generally held by the American courts. The doctrine in this state and the other American states is that the ignoring of an indictment by one grand jury is no bar to a subsequent grand jury investigating…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCravyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. United States v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1904
  3. United States v. DavidsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1917
  4. United States v. MusgraveDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1908
  5. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API