People v. Collins
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
The mandate of State mental health legislation is unequivocal: in an involuntary admission, an examining physician or psychiatrist must first personally inform the patient of his rights or that examiner will not be permitted to testify as to the patient’s admissions at any subsequent court hearing.
The intent and direction of the legislature here is manifest — yet such command has clearly been flouted in this case.
We reverse and remand.
Respondent appeals his involuntary admission to the Department of Mental Health. The premier issue before this court is whether the order finding him subject to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re StephensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. SansoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- The People v. EnglishIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- People Ex Rel. Keith v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In the Interest of GoodwinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. JamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- People v. SatterleeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Lanett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.