Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McConnell v. Akins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 15, 2003No. A03A1249Published

1ConcurrenceAdams, Judge

I fully concur in this opinion, but write separately with regard to Division 2. While I agree with the reasoning in this Division, I note that when the trial court excused the juror, the jury had already been sworn and there is nothing in the record indicating that the juror was replaced. The parties stipulated in the pre-trial order that the case would be tried by 12 jurors, and that no alternate jurors would be selected. They further stipulated that the trial court could excuse two jurors for good cause, but that the case would not proceed to verdict with less than ten jurors. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hague v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API