Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Parsons v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2013No. 11-AA-1606Published

1Concurring in the judgmentSchwelb, Senior Judge

I agree with the court’s opinion as far as it goes, and I therefore concur in the judgment. In my opinion, however, the case presents several issues that merit fuller *652treatment than the court has given them. Accordingly, I write separately to state my views on these issues.

I

On November 17, 2011, following an evi-dentiary hearing, the Board of Zoning Adjustment issued a “Summary Order” granting the application of Stephanie and John Lester for a special exception from zoning requirements applicable to their residence at 117 C Street, S.E., in Washington, D.C. The purpose of the special…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. York Apartments Tenants Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Economides v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. 1303 Clifton Street, LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API