Legal Opinion
State v. Cheatham
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 2004No. 2004-KA-0095PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
| ¶ ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On September 9, 2003 the State filed a bill of information charging the appellant Brandon Cheatham with one count of possession of cocaine, a violation of La. R.S. 40:967. He was arraigned and entered a not guilty plea on September 19, 2003. On October 10, 2003, after hearing testimony, the trial court denied the appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. On October 17, 2003 the appellant withdrew his former plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty, reserving his right to appeal the adverse ruling on the motion to suppress the evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. VessellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MathieuLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- State v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007