Legal Opinion
Chi-Mil Corp. v. W. T. Grant Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 8, 1976No. Civ. A. No. 75-C-507PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
This is an action by a lessor against his lessee and his lessee’s assignee. Jurisdiction exists under the diversity provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
After the pleadings were closed, the plaintiff Chi-Mil Corporation (“Chi-Mil”) moved the Court for a partial judgment on the pleadings “relative to the continuing payment of rent.” In a memorandum decision and order entered February 9, 1976, this Court granted Chi-Mil’s motion as to the defendant Forest City Enterprises, Inc. (“Forest City”). The matter now before the Court is Forest City’s motion for an amendment of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Selts Investment Co. v. Promoters of the Federated Nations of the World, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Seaman v. AschermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Ross v. SmigelskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Selts Investment Co. v. Promoters of the Federated Nations of the World, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Sterling Shoes Corp. v. Plankinton Building Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sandoz v. Conoco, Inc. (In Re Delta Energy Resources, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1986
- In Re Amica, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Kroger Co. v. Chimneyville Properties, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1991
- Erving Paper Mills Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- McLaughlin Transportation Systems, Inc. v. RubinsteinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.