Legal Opinion

Mann v. Compania Petrolera Trans-Cuba, S. A.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William 0. Hecht, Jr., J.

This action was brought by a stockholder of defendant, a Cuban corporation, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 977-b of the Civil Practice Act. The complaint seeks the appointment of a permanent receiver to liquidate and distribute the New York assets of defendant.

Babinowitz & Boudin appeared as attorneys for defendant corporation. They were apparently authorized to do so by one Soto, who was appointed “ interventor ” of the corporation pursuant to Cuban law.

The present motion is by Arthur Goldstein to have himself substituted as attorney for the corporation. He has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moscow Fire Insurance Co. of Moscow, Russia v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tole S.A. v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Mann v. Compania Petrolera Trans-Cuba, S. A.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API