Legal Opinion
Curles v. Curles
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 15, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 4432-54PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGARRAGHY, District Judge.
This is an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is the legal and equitable owner of premises situated in the rear of 137-139 D Street, N. E., Washington, D. C., and for the clear value of the use and occupancy of said premises ; that the plaintiff and defendant each is the legal and equitable owner of an undivided one-half interest in and to premises 1251 U Street, S. E., Washington, D. C., and for partition and sale thereof; that the plaintiff and defendant each was the legal and equitable owner of an undivided one-half interest in certain real estate…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Morrish v. MorrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Bowie v. StonestreetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Filson v. FountainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doolin v. Environmental Power Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Posnick v. PosnickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Busboom v. BusboomDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962