Legal Opinion

Efef Associates, Inc. v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The State Bent Administrator was justified in this case in holding that the rent increase was obtained under circumstances and upon representations which amounted to an undertaking by the landlord that the service of elevator operators would be maintained as long as the increase was in effect. (State Besidential Bent Law, § 4, subd. 4, par. [d]; L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd.) If the landlord desires to be relieved of the obligation of maintaining manual operators on the self-service elevators, an appropriate application may be made to the Bent Administrator, who may then make such order as is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. 147 East 84th St. Corp. v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Konigsberg v. CaputaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Juxbush Realty Corp. v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Juxbush Realty Corp. v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API