Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1969No. Docket No. 4,947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant’s probationary sentence was revoked at a hearing during which he was not offered or represented by counsel.

Mempa v. Rhay (1967), 389 US 128 (88 S Ct 254, 19 L Ed 2d 336) requires that the court advise one accused of probation violation of his right to be represented by counsel and, if indigent, to the appointment of assigned counsel if the violation hearing includes sentencing. That holding applies retroactively. McConnell v. Rhay (1968), 393 US 2 (89 S Ct 32, 21 L Ed 2d 2); People v. Marshall (1969), 16 Mich App 578.

The revocation of the defendant’s probation and sentence to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McConnell v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. MarshallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API