Legal Opinion

Palantir Technologies Inc. v. Abramowitz

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 7, 2022No. 5:19-cv-06879Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC., Case No. 19-cv-06879-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE 9 v. [Re: ECF No. 356-63, 365, 366] 10 MARC L. ABRAMOWITZ, 11 Defendant. 12 13 In preparation for trial the Court held the Final Pretrial Conference in this case on October 14 13, 2022, during which the Court issued oral rulings on the parties’ motions in limine. See 15 Motions, ECF Nos. 356-63, 365, 366. The Court’s rulings on the parties’ motions in limine are set 16 forth as follows. 17 I. PLAINTIFF’S…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API