Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hudson v. Hudson

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1988No. Civ. 6167Published

1DissentHolmes, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Appeals involving the admissibility of certain evidence and the effect of that evidence on a trial court’s final judgment are often difficult to resolve — this is especially true when the law regarding the admissibility of certain evidence is altered by the appellate courts during the trial court’s proceedings. Certainly, this case highlights that difficulty.

With that difficulty in mind, I am generally in agreement with the majority’s conclusions as to the admissibility of the evidence in this case. However, upon due consideration of the record, I believe that the case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols ChagraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. CarrollDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
  3. Davis v. DavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Cooper v. CooperCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Walker v. WalkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API