Legal Opinion
Nash v. Kester
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1985No. 84-2539PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
I. FACTS.
Plaintiffs Wayne and Jeanette Nash (the “Nashes”) filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the 1978 United States Bankruptcy Code (the “1978 Code”) on April 25, 1980. Defendant Duncan Kes-ter (the “Trustee”) was appointed the Chapter 13 trustee. Defendant National Semiconductor Federal Credit Union (the “Credit Union”), which had financed the Nashes’ purchase of two automobiles, filed a secured claim with the bankruptcy court in the amount of $6,728.50. The Credit Union’s secured claim was allowed as part of the Chapter 13 plan…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Cochise College Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Income Property Builders, Inc., Debtor. Armel Laminates, Inc. v. The Lomas & Nettleton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Levy v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re New England Fish CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Carlos Resendez, Jr., and Marlene Resendez v. Dwight Lindquist, William Westphal and J. J. MickelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tsafaroff v. Taylor (In re Taylor)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- 13 Collier bankr.cas.2d 209, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,649 in Re Wayne M. Nash and Jeanette Nash, Debtors. Wayne M. Nash and Jeanette Nash v. Duncan H. Kester, Trustee and National Semiconductor Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Waugh v. Saldamarco (In Re Waugh)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- In re HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- In Re De VosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.