Legal Opinion

Messer v. Marsh

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 14, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Greene ¡District Court. — E. G. Albert, Judge. Suit in equity by plaintiff and interveners, taxpayers, to enjoin defendants, contractors, and the city of Jefferson from carrying out a contract for construction of pavement. From decree in favor of plaintiff and interveners, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.

i. municipal con-puw1cICimprove-ments: failure resolution. In February, 1920, the council of the city of Jefferson passed a resolution of necessity, under the statutes passed by the Thirty-sixth General Assembly providing for the Paving of main traveled highways leading out from towns or cities which are within the corporate limits of the same, for paving of certain highways within the city of Jefferson. . The proposed resolution of necessity divided the paving project into two paving districts, Nos. 7 and 8. The paving district No. 7 was approximately the mile of paving ordered in on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Heins v. LincolnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Comstock v. City of Eagle GroveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Moore v. City Council of PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Miller v. City of OelweinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Rafferty v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Incorporated Town of RolfeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Perrott v. BalkemaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. O'Shonessy v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API