Legal Opinion

Gum v. Fitzgerald

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1977No. Docket 31318PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the October 19, 1976, judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, awarding plaintiffs $545 in damages for the conversion of some of their personal property by defendants. Plaintiffs contend that the award is inadequate.

James and Janice Gum, plaintiffs, entered into a rental agreement with Robert and Margaret Fitzgerald, defendants, on March 14, 1973. In July of 1973 defendants locked plaintiffs from the rental premises prior to a termination of the tenancy and while plaintiffs’ personal possessions and household goods remained in the premises.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thoma v. Tracy Motor Sales, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Nelson & Witt v. Texas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Schara v. ThiedeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Baxter v. WoodwardMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Miller v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trail Clinic, Pc v. BlochMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Cook v. United States (In Re Earl Roggenbuck Farms, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  3. Willis v. Ed Hudson Towing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Providence Hill, LLC v. Damien NdzangaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API