Legal Opinion
Berman v. Goldsmith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for replevin and to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), entered March 10, 1987, as granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint to the extent of dismissing the plaintiff’s causes of action sounding in conversion and replevin.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The three-year Statute of Limitations period, applicable in conversion and replevin actions (CPLR 214 [3]), ordinarily runs from the date the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Federal Insurance v. FriesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
- Al-Roc Products Corp. v. Union Dime Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dudek v. Nassau County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Smith v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Torrance Construction, Inc. v. JaquesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- USHA Holdings, LLC v. Franchise India Holdings Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- In re the Estate of KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.