Legal Opinion
Benson v. Harpstead
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 8, 2021No. 0:17-cv-00266Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Michael D. Benson, Civil No. 17-266 (DWF/TNL) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM v. OPINION AND ORDER Jodi Harpstead1, Comm. of the Dept. of Human Services, et al., Defendants. Michael D. Benson, pro se. Ralph John Detrick, Assistant Attorney General, Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, counsel for Defendants. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Michael D. Benson’s (“Benson”) pro se Rule 60 Motion to Vacate this Court’s order and judgment adopting Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung’s July 29, 2020 Report and Recommendation.2 (Doc. No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- In Re Guidant Corp. Implantable DefibrillatorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Carol Harley Lenora Banaszewski Michael Payton, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Richard Zoesch v. Guilio Agostini Michael J. Barrett Larry E. Eaton Harry A. Hammerly Richard A. Lidstad Dwight A. Peterson John J. Ursu, Carol Harley Lenora Banaszewski Michael Payton, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Richard Zoesch v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.