Legal Opinion

In re Lissburger

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 1, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Shipman, D. J.

This is a motion to confirm the report of George P. Betts, Esq., to whom reference was made by order, dated March 8,1876, to ascertain the amount due from Holmes & Lissburger to Henry P. Hamill. Holmes & Lissburger filed exceptions to the report.

In May, 1874, the firm of Holmes & Lissburger and Henry P. Hamill were each large dealers of metals in the city of New York. Each was aware that the other was financially embarrassed and needed assistance to raise money. In that month Hamill applied to Holmes & Lissburger for the loan of their paper, to his order, to the amount of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re PurcellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HolmesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API