State ex rel. McDougall v. Quinn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
In the action of Neis Johnson v. Mary V. Roche, which was tried in the district court for Jackson county before Quinn, J., findings were filed and judgment was ordered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $4,390.61, and thereafter judgment was entered therein pursuant to the findings. Subsequently judgment was ordered and entered for the same sum against George W. Wilson & Son, garnishees, upon their disclosure.
Read the full summary
In the action of Neis Johnson v. Mary V. Roche, which was tried in the district court for Jackson county before Quinn, J., findings were filed and judgment was ordered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $4,390.61, and thereafter judgment was entered therein pursuant to the findings. Subsequently judgment was ordered and entered for the same sum against George W. Wilson & Son, garnishees, upon their disclosure. Thereupon the proceedings stated in the first paragraph of the opinion were taken.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was tried before the court below without a jury at the January, 1908, general term, and resulted in a judgment for plaintiffs, pursuant to findings and order therefor filed August 31, 1908. Thereafter a “case” purporting to contain all the evidence pertinent to certain of the findings to which exceptions were taken was served upon plaintiffs’ counsel, who refused to accept the same on the ground and for the reason that it was served too late. No amendments were therefore proposed. Thereafter due notice was given that the proposed case would be presented to the trial judge for…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Hemza v. FishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. QvaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910