Legal Opinion

Stacy v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1611 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DiSalle,

Richard P. Stacy (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying him benefits pursuant to Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802 (b) (1).

There is no question in this case but that Claimant voluntarily terminated his employment. Claimant takes the position, however, that the Board erred in concluding that he did not have necessitous and compelling reasons for leaving. He avers that,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Employment SEC. Com'n of Wyoming v. BryantWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Donaldson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Wilson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Employment SEC. Com'n of Wyoming v. BryantWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API