Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Middlesex Water Company
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 31, 1978PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
158 N.J. Super. 368 (1978)
386 A.2d 405
LOUISE T. HARRISON, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM B. HARRISON, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MIDDLESEX WATER COMPANY AND TOWNSHIP OF CLARK, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 3, 1978.
Supplemental Memoranda Submitted February 21, 1978.
March 9, 1978.
Decided March 31, 1978.
Before Judges FRITZ, BOTTER and ARD.
Mr. William J. Gearty argued the cause for the appellant.
Mr. Robert T. Hueston argued the cause for the respondent Middlesex Water Company (Messrs. Hueston,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Boileau v. De CeccoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Magro v. City of VinelandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Brett v. Great American Recreation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Eyrich for Eyrich v. DamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.