Legal Opinion

Jane Deselle Bruce v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1990No. 89-4951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

In this Louisiana diversity case, plaintiff-appellant Jane Deselle Bruce (Jane Bruce) appeals the district court’s denial of her summary judgment motion and its granting that of defendant-appellee Hartford Life & Casualty Company (Hartford). We reverse and remand.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Jane Bruce seeks to recover on Hartford’s insurance policy for benefits allegedly payable to her thereunder on account of the death of Ted Matthew Bruce (Ted Bruce).

Jane Bruce and Ted Bruce were married on April 4, 1981. On September 10, 1984, Jane Bruce filed a petition for divorce…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Dunn v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Arceneaux v. ArceneauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Howard v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Anderson v. QuincyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larocca v. LaroccaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. State ex rel. C.P., K.P.P. & K.M.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API