Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Billups

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 20, 1932PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Dietzman—

Reversing.

This proceeding was initiated in the county court for the purpose of probating the alleged lost will of H. E. Ferguson. The application was denied in the county court, but upon an appeal to the circuit court the propounders were successful. The alleged lost will devised all of Ferguson’s property to Maggie Billups, a foster daughter, whom he had reared from infancy, and to whom he was devoted. The present appeal is by the collateral relatives of Ferguson who would inherit his property in the absence of a will. In order to establish a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Broughton's Administrator v. Congleton Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Webster v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  3. Mercer v. Mercer's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  4. Wood v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Chisholm's Heirs v. BenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dossenbach v. Reidhar's Ex'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Truitt v. Truitt's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. Hewitt v. General Tire and Rubber CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Allen v. Lovell's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  5. Clemens v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API