Legal Opinion · Dissent

Huley v. Huley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 30, 1922No. 2769Published

1DissentHill, J.

I also dissent from the decision of the majority, for the following reasons: In addition to what the writer said in the. case of Bentley v. Bentley, 149 Ga. 707 (supra), as to a suit for divorce being maintainable against a minor without a guardian ad litem being appointed. The general rule it that a minor can not contract. Civil Code (1910), § 4232. But the statute makes an exception to this rule in the case of a minor contracting marriage and making “settlements.” The Civil Code (1910), § 4236, provides: “Marriage contracts and settlement made by infants, but of lawful age to marry, are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bentley v. BentleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API