Legal Opinion

Stull v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1956No. 6036PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This is a quiet title action. Appellees filed their complaint alleging fee simple ownership of the premises involved. The answer denied allegations of substance. Further answering, appellants made claim to an undivided interest in the premises, and from an adverse judgment, they appeal.

Appellees’ 'predecessors in title, Oscar Lohman and Vincent B. May, acquired 173 acres of land by patent from the United States Government. Subsequently, Lohman conveyed an undivided one-half interest therein to one Mary J. Cuniffe, who held the same as tenant in common with the patentee,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sandoval County Board of Education v. YoungNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Baker v. De ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Edwards v. PetersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Witherspoon v. BrummettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Jackson v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marquez v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Chalmers v. HughesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Jones v. TateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Prince v. Charles Ilfeld CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API