Legal Opinion

Kirkwood v. Peden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Civil actioN, tried at October Term, 1916, of Scotland, before Cline, J. A jury trial being waived, the court found the facts and rendered judgment denying the relief prayed and dismissing the action. Plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.

By this action the plaintiffs seek to subject certain land in Laurinburg, Scotland County, to the payment of a judgment duly rendered and docketed in 1885 in favor of "W,. E. and' 'D. D. Gibson v. ~W. H. McLaurin, which judgment is now the property of plaintiffs. The defendants plead the statute of limitations and an estoppel by judgment of record. We will consider only the former. The following is a brief summary of the facts found by the court,:

The land sought to be impressed with the alleged judgment lien was acquired in fee simple by W. H. McLaurin about 1866. On 1 July, *4611S79, said…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Matthews v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. McDonald v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Citizens' National Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Hicks v. . WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Stokes v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Brown v. . HardingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Dalrymple v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API