Legal Opinion
People v. McCartney
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1976PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
This case concerns the construction and application of CPL 640.10 (subd 3), the "Uniform Act To Secure Attendance Of Witnesses From Without The State In Crimi*620nal Cases.”1 We have not previously had occasion to construe and apply this statute which has now been enacted by some 47 States and the District of Columbia. The "Uniform Act” enables a State to secure the attendance of witnesses who are not located within its borders and are, hence, immune to its normal subpoena power. Defendant contends that he was denied the right to secure compulsory attendance of witnesses on his behalf, given to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- New York v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Glynn v. DonnellyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973
3Cited by41 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WatkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- United States v. Ismaili, Lakbir Moulay. Appeal of Lakbir Moulay IsmailiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. IvoryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of Codey (Capital Cities, Abc)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.