Jean Ho-Rath v. Rhode Island Hospital
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1DissentJustice Flaherty
I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority’s opinion that holds that the plaintiffs, Jean and Bunsan Ho-Rath, are precluded from bringing a lawsuit on behalf of their minor daughter, Yendee, and that Yendee must wait until she reaches the age of eighteen to file suit for the medical negligence that she alleges she suffered at the hands of the defendants. I do not agree with the majority that the statute is clear and unambiguous. In my opinion, G.L.1956 § 9-1-14.1(1) can be fairly read as either: (1) prohibiting, until he or she reaches the age of majority, the initiation of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Roe v. GelineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Ryan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Direct Action for Rights & Equality v. GannonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.