Legal Opinion

Page v. Schweiker

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1985No. Civ.A. No. 82-1338PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the court is plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).1 For the reasons discussed hereinafter, we have determined that a fee award is appropriate.2

II. Background

Plaintiff in the current matter, which challenged recoupment procedures utilized in Title XVI SSI cases, has been represented by counsel from Central Pennsylvania Legal Services from the time this action was filed on October 27, 1982. On September 2, 1983, we filed a memorandum and order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Dougherty, Gregory v. Lehman, John, Secretary of the Navy, Dougherty, Gregory v. Lehman, John, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Berman v. SchweikerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  5. Tressler v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bunn v. BowenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API