Legal Opinion

Faircloth v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1943No. 30006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

In Bell v. State, 14 Ga. App. 425 (81 S. E. 253), this court held that in a similar prosecution, “An accusation which sets forth the offense in the language of the Code, or so plainly that the nature of the offense can easily be understood by the jury is sufficient;' . . and the court did not err in overruling a demurrer based upon the ground that the accusation failed to specify what crops, or to whom the crops alleged to have been sold, were sold, or the price received, or the amount sold, or the nature or terms of the contract under which the landlord’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toler v. SeabrookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Cornwell v. LeveretteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Rosenstein v. ForesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bostic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Bostic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API