Legal Opinion

Quilici v. Thompson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1941No. 3341PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Orr, J.:

We have before us two propositions for determination:

First, was the judgment procured by respondent on the 6th day of November 1933, in the District Court of Elko County, discharged by bankruptcy proceedings subsequently instituted by appellant on the 10th day of September 1934 in the District Court of the United States for the District of Nevada;

Second, if the said judgment was not discharged by said bankruptcy proceeding's, is respondent in a position to assert his right thereto and thereunder in view of the fact that the said judgment was assigned by respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calmenson v. MoudrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Morency v. LandrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API