Legal Opinion

Rausch v. Finney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2005No. 66A03-0504-CV-164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Appellant, by counsel, has filed a Motion to Clarify Appellate Court Jurisdiction and/or Accept Jurisdiction of Interlocutory Appeal. The Appellees, by counsel, have filed a Response.

Appellant Rausch was in an automobile collision in 2001 with a truck driven by Appellee Finney, an employee of Appellee Shurlow Trucking. In June of 2003, Rausch sued Finney and Shurlow Truck ing, and she responded to several requests from the Appellees for medical records. However, Rausch refused later requests for medical records that, according to Rausch, deal with medical conditions that arose after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cua v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Ann Rachelle Johnson v. Dr. A., Dr. B., and Medical ProviderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State of Indiana v. Axel Domingo DiegoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API